Welcome to FanIQ!
FanIQ is the ultimate free community for sports fans.
Talk sports with fans from all over - 1,232,017+ Comments
Track your game picks - 14,800,358+ Sports Predictions
Prove you know sports - 64,776+ Trivia Questions
Find fans of your teams - 1,758,006+ New Friends
About the Author - 100%InjuryRate
Tom Brady Blasts ESPN

Tom Terrific Is Burning Bridges At A Tremendous Rate

by 100%InjuryRate 100%InjuryRate | >7 days ago176 Comment Comments »

Tom Brady Blasts ESPN Photo Remember back in the day when Tom Brady was scheduled to be president in 2028? Then he decided to knock up his girlfriend before ditching her for Gisele. So much for that.

Naturally another line of work open to Brady is becoming a talking head for ESPN. Wait, scratch that as well.

Tuesday afternoon Brady appeared on WEEI radio in Boston to talk about an upcoming charity event when he got lobbed a few questions on Spygate. He chose to rip the media, and more specifically, ESPN.
"I think it's a way to really sell newspapers, and all the ESPN stations, they've got to fill the air, too," Brady said.
That's not too bad, and probably more or less true, but Brady decided to continue when it was mentioned that many of the ex-NFL players who work at ESPN were harshly critical of the Patriots and suggested that they gained a huge advantage from stealing signals.
"It's just kind of the environment right now, though. I think that's the way that guys make it. They just say the craziest things. That's what ESPN has become. ESPN, to me, is like MTV without the videos, ESPN is without the highlights."
Well, I guess there's always Fox Sports or CBS for Tom.

Anyway, I actually thought the arguments put forth by the ex-players were dead on about the advantage the Patriots gained by stealing signals, even though Brady is right to a degree about ESPN in general.

I'm just starting to wonder what the heck is going on with Brady. Last year he gave the famous "We're trying to kill everyone" line, he's on a team that arguably won three dirty Super Bowls, he's insulting former players, and he isn't holding his tongue on ESPN either.

He's pretty much become the Darth Vader of football. Which is exactly why 18-1 will never get old.


[HT: Fanhouse; Audio portion at Awful Announcing]

Read Related:  NFL
Teams:  New England Patriots
Players:  Tom Brady
Tagged as:  Dumbass
 &nbp;
TOP COMMENT * * * * * * * * * * * *
#101 | 55 days ago

RespectTheStar wrote:
Do you wanna bring some sort of numbers to back of your mouth or you just gonna let that thing run off the hook?
+13 thumbs up3 Super Bowl Rings > 1 Fumbled Snap.

Math class is over.

I don't even like the Patriots, but you are a fool.
  
176 Comments | Sorted by Most Recent First

Vote for your favorite comments. Fans decide the Top Comment (3+ votes) and also hide poor quality comments (4+ votes).
#1 | 55 days ago

+3 thumbs upI don't know if this will hurt any broadcasting in the future or not .  ESPN seems very forgiving to jocks who might put more potatoes on the couch watching them.
#2 | 55 days ago

+6 thumbs upHis day is coming...keep digging that hole cause you will be in that hole soon enough. 
#3 | 55 days ago

Tom Brady could beat up Jim Rome and ESPN would still be foaming at the mouth to hire him when he retires.
#4 | 55 days ago

+6 thumbs upDude, you guys cheated and you still lost, thats what you get
#5 | 55 days ago

+2 thumbs upGood for him, ESPN is a muckraking organization anyway, but then I guess all sports 'journalism' is. 
Poor Quality (5) This comment was voted poor quality by FanIQ (Show anyway)
#7 | 55 days ago

+3 thumbs up

I'm sure he's been hounded lately for comment on this topic, but he really didn't need to go down this road.  If he'd won the Super Bowl, everything woulda been about the Golden Boy.  Instead, Romo n Jessica r getting all the press, and all of a sudden we have a third country heard from. 

 

Maybe what he's really angry about is that no one seems to remember his record setting year.  Maybe w/ all this, it's become a tarnished record?  Well, Barry Bonds never failed a drug test either. 

 

But he was right about one thing, ESPN is a bunch of whore-mongers who'll go after any story, b/c they r a news station, first and foremost.  Even a broken clock is right twice a day.  But that's not a reflection of former NFL players who know just how it might help saying just that.  Get over urself Brady.

#8 | 55 days ago

+3 thumbs upDon't really care ... Tom is NOT the God of football
#9 | 55 days ago

derms33 wrote:
Dude, you guys cheated and you still lost, thats what you get
+2 thumbs up& exactly how did they cheat in the 1 game they lost?
#10 | 55 days ago

(Edited 05/14/08 8:51PM by augdog9)
+4 thumbs upI guess we'll see how good of a coach Bellacheat is when he doesn't have an unfair advantage. Brady is a cry baby punk.
#11 | 55 days ago

+1 thumbs upNo, he prefers those kissasses at CBS and Fox that prefer to shove their heads so far up his golden ass. Never understood how honestly jimmy terry, howy and chris(all former players) could think that they didnt gain sny advantage from doing this . ESPN all did it at first too. "Ahhh...this istn as big of a deal as everyone is making it out to be". Now Slareth(spelling) is the head of the class srying about how it helped them. ESPN- perfect example of crappy journalism and favortism. The Pats-Cheaters, and very very sore losers. Tom Brady- The most overrated QB in the NFL Today, and a whiner to boot. God I love this game.
#12 | 55 days ago

RespectTheStar wrote:
No, he prefers those kissasses at CBS and Fox that prefer to shove their heads so far up his golden ass. Never understood how honestly jimmy terry, howy and chris(all former players) could think that they didnt gain sny advantage from doing this . ESPN all did it at first too. "Ahhh...this istn as big of a deal as everyone is making it out to be". Now Slareth(spelling) is the head of the class srying about how it helped them. ESPN- perfect example of crappy journalism and favortism. The Pats-Cheaters, and very very sore losers. Tom Brady- The most overrated QB in the NFL Today, and a whiner to boot. God I love this game.
+3 thumbs upTony Homo fan calling Brady overrated?  Classic.
#13 | 55 days ago

Do you wanna bring some sort of numbers to back of your mouth or you just gonna let that thing run off the hook?
#14 | 55 days ago

RespectTheStar wrote:
Do you wanna bring some sort of numbers to back of your mouth or you just gonna let that thing run off the hook?
+13 thumbs up3 Super Bowl Rings > 1 Fumbled Snap.

Math class is over.

I don't even like the Patriots, but you are a fool.
#15 | 54 days ago

+6 thumbs upCan we stop with this spygate crap. Brady is right. Its stupid and has gotten way out of hand. Move on with your lives people. Especially you ESPN!
#16 | 54 days ago

RenegadeLG wrote:
3 Super Bowl Rings > 1 Fumbled Snap.

Math class is over.

I don't even like the Patriots, but you are a fool.
+2 thumbs upThats all you got? Really? Come on kid.....use your brain. First off, how many more years does brady have on romo? 5? Romo's only played one full season. Give him four more before we make comparisions between romo then and brady now.
#17 | 54 days ago

+1 thumbs upI don't like Brady or Romo .. this is funny!!
#18 | 54 days ago

RespectTheStar wrote:
Thats all you got? Really? Come on kid.....use your brain. First off, how many more years does brady have on romo? 5? Romo's only played one full season. Give him four more before we make comparisions between romo then and brady now.
+5 thumbs up

If you want you can be fair and do a comparison of their first year in the playoffs... then it would go something like this:

 

Brady--- Superbowl ring

Romo--- fumbled snap

 

I'm just sayin'

#19 | 54 days ago

Buttons wrote:

If you want you can be fair and do a comparison of their first year in the playoffs... then it would go something like this:

 

Brady--- Superbowl ring

Romo--- fumbled snap

 

I'm just sayin'

+3 thumbs upIt was like another Dallas fan defending the Mavericks in another thread, saying he's better than Steinbrenner but you can't compare yet because Cuban hasn't owned a team for 30+ years.  But Steinbrenner had more success in the same amount of time that Cuban HAS been in the league.

Nobody is going to wait around 5 years to prove this guy wrong, and he knows that, so he'll talk trash.  Brady was better earlier.
#20 | 54 days ago

RespectTheStar wrote:
Thats all you got? Really? Come on kid.....use your brain. First off, how many more years does brady have on romo? 5? Romo's only played one full season. Give him four more before we make comparisions between romo then and brady now.
+3 thumbs upYou're not really trying to compare Tony Romo and Tom Brady are you?
#21 | 54 days ago

+5 thumbs up

All this is, is more fuel for the fire that will burn Brady until he wins the SuperBowl next year.

 

But on my personal preferrence side... I'd chose Bridget Moynahan over Gieselle. I guess it's my strong attraction to brunettes.

#22 | 54 days ago

augdog9 wrote:
I guess we'll see how good of a coach Bellacheat is when he doesn't have an unfair advantage. Brady is a cry baby punk.
+2 thumbs upI dunno 17-1 since he stopped chea..... I mean filming signals sounds pretty good to me.
#23 | 54 days ago

RenegadeLG wrote:
It was like another Dallas fan defending the Mavericks in another thread, saying he's better than Steinbrenner but you can't compare yet because Cuban hasn't owned a team for 30+ years.  But Steinbrenner had more success in the same amount of time that Cuban HAS been in the league.

Nobody is going to wait around 5 years to prove this guy wrong, and he knows that, so he'll talk trash.  Brady was better earlier.
Was he? Hmmm....lets compare the two kids first year.Completion Percentage: Brady 63.9 Romo-64.4. Yards: Brady- 2843 Romo4211. Tds: Brady 18 Romo 36 . Yards/game: Brady 185.5 Romo 263.2 . QB rating: 86.5 Romo 97.4. Infact, sans 2007-2008, brady had only broken a 90 qb rating twice in his career, had never thrown more then 28 td's, never thrown over 4110 yards. Romo has never thrown for less then  4211 yards, 36 td's , and hasnt had a career rating lower then 97.4. Looks to me, comparitvley, romo has had the almost the same level of sucsess as brady in his first year. True, he didnt win the superbowl, the biggest stat that counts, but had an equal amount of sucsess through the first season as brady did. BEsides, you cant count the superbowl that year. The pats cheated. Or did you conviently forget that one?
#24 | 54 days ago

RespectTheStar wrote:
Was he? Hmmm....lets compare the two kids first year.Completion Percentage: Brady 63.9 Romo-64.4. Yards: Brady- 2843 Romo4211. Tds: Brady 18 Romo 36 . Yards/game: Brady 185.5 Romo 263.2 . QB rating: 86.5 Romo 97.4. Infact, sans 2007-2008, brady had only broken a 90 qb rating twice in his career, had never thrown more then 28 td's, never thrown over 4110 yards. Romo has never thrown for less then  4211 yards, 36 td's , and hasnt had a career rating lower then 97.4. Looks to me, comparitvley, romo has had the almost the same level of sucsess as brady in his first year. True, he didnt win the superbowl, the biggest stat that counts, but had an equal amount of sucsess through the first season as brady did. BEsides, you cant count the superbowl that year. The pats cheated. Or did you conviently forget that one?
+2 thumbs upWe were talking rings.  Why doesn't Romo have one yet?  Are you saying you'll continue to take the great fantasy numbers even if he continues to falter in the clutch?
#25 | 54 days ago

augdog9 wrote:
I guess we'll see how good of a coach Bellacheat is when he doesn't have an unfair advantage. Brady is a cry baby punk.
Who had an unfair advantage? I sure as hell haven't seen one.
#26 | 54 days ago

(Edited 05/19/08 5:16PM by Gazzo)
RespectTheStar wrote:
Was he? Hmmm....lets compare the two kids first year.Completion Percentage: Brady 63.9 Romo-64.4. Yards: Brady- 2843 Romo4211. Tds: Brady 18 Romo 36 . Yards/game: Brady 185.5 Romo 263.2 . QB rating: 86.5 Romo 97.4. Infact, sans 2007-2008, brady had only broken a 90 qb rating twice in his career, had never thrown more then 28 td's, never thrown over 4110 yards. Romo has never thrown for less then  4211 yards, 36 td's , and hasnt had a career rating lower then 97.4. Looks to me, comparitvley, romo has had the almost the same level of sucsess as brady in his first year. True, he didnt win the superbowl, the biggest stat that counts, but had an equal amount of sucsess through the first season as brady did. BEsides, you cant count the superbowl that year. The pats cheated. Or did you conviently forget that one?
+5 thumbs upIf you are going to try and quote stats, at least quote the correct stats. You used Brady's stats from 2001 which is indeed his first season,but was not a full season. Then you used Romo's stats from 2007 which was NOT his first year, but WAS a full season. Nice try. Real mature. Romo actually threw for 2,903 yds in his first season only 60 more than Brady (albeit in 4 less starts). As for your stupid little QB rating comparison, well it holds no water. Romo came to a team with Terrell Owens already on it. Brady, up until this past season, has played and WON with a bunch of nobodies. You tell me why Romo has a better QB rating.

You also left out how each of their first seasons ended (which has been pointed out by several other people on this thread). Romo's ended with a fumble, and Brady's with a Super Bowl ring.

All stats aside, Tony Romo doesn't even come close to Tom Brady. Your taking 1.5 years of stats for Romo and somehow trying to make them sound like he is in the HOF after a 20 year career. Get over it, your boy ain't #1 and may never be. O yea and grow up.
#27 | 52 days ago